After a decade of rapid, chaotic bank liberalisation, Vietnam has ended up with too many domestic banks (42) – many of which are overloaded with toxic debt – and poor governance across the system, economists warn.
Last year, faced with persistently high inflation and critical liquidity conditions at many of the weaker banks, the government announced aggressive restructuring plans.
But as inflation has fallen – from a high of 23 per cent last August to 8.3 per cent last month, allowing the central bank to increase money supply and easing banks’ liquidity problems – so too have appetites for reform.
“Things have calmed down a bit because of falling inflation.
So now they’re thinking ‘OK we don’t have to be so aggressive’,” said economist Nguyen Xuan Thanh, director of the public-policy programme at the Fulbright Schoolin Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC).
“The second factor (slowing reform) is the resistance from the banks, from the owners of the banks…
The political economy doesn’t allow the government to act decisively by taking over a bank and cleaning it up to sell.”
Aside from five fully foreign- owned banks, such as ANZ and HSBC, the sector is dominated by large state-owned banks and dozens of smaller joint-stock banks owned by public or private investors.
After years of rapid credit growth, the balance sheets of many of these banks are weighed down by toxic loans – the majority of which went to badly run state-owned enterprises and speculative property investments.
While the larger state banks benefit from an implicit government guarantee and continued investor confidence, many of the joint-stock banks have serious liquidity problems and can barely stay afloat, experts say.
This has hit the broader economy – credit lines have all but dried up, which has affected small and medium-sized businesses particularly badly, with some 18,000 going bankrupt this year alone.
Unless there is decisive restructuring, the system will remain unhealthy “and the economy as a whole will suffer”, said Mr Thanh.
What the government needs to do is “take over the weakest banks, merge them, sell off the bad debt and then resell the merged bank”, said Mr Jonathan Pincus, an HCMC-based economist from the Harvard Kennedy School’s Vietnam programme.
“It would be quicker and less risky for the system as a whole.
But bank owners would resist this,” he said.
To have a banking licence inVietnam, you have to be “very well connected”, said one Hanoi-based diplomat. Bank ownership brings benefits – the possibility of kickbacks, and access to cheap credit.
Many small joint-stock banks are owned by subsidiaries of state-owned enterprises or well-connected groups of investors who own multiple banks, evading regulations with accounting tricks.
The sector is riddled with complex cross-ownership patterns which are proving “politically difficult to unwind”, Mr Pincus said.